This article was originally distributed via PRWeb. PRWeb, WorldNow and this Site make no warranties or representations in connection therewith.
According to court documents, on November 19th, 2012, Baltimore woman Angela Denise Washington filed a lawsuit in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court (case no. 2:2012cv06506) alleging she suffered pulmonary embolism from NuvaRing, a popular internal birth control device. Now, AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, can provide helpful, proven advice and simple solutions including how to get in contact with legal counsel so anyone can easily and inexpensively deal with cases of alleged NuvaRing severe adverse events. [http://www.attorneyone.com/nuva-ring-lawsuit/
San Diego, CA (PRWEB) December 13, 2012
The media spotlight is often a double-edged sword. No one knows this better than women who filed a NuvaRing Recall lawsuit. And yet, gossip and rumor-mongering aside, the real story here is being overlooked according to Sean Burke of AttorneyOne.
According to court documents, on November 19th, 2012, Baltimore woman Angela Denise Washington filed a lawsuit in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court (case no. 2:2012cv06506) alleging she suffered pulmonary embolism from NuvaRing. NuvaRing is a popular internal birth control device, a vaginal ring placed near the cervix that was approved by the FDA in 2001. In the lawsuit, plaintiff claims she started using NuvaRing in 2004 and a few months later she suffered pulmonary embolism.
In 2011, the FDA published a birth control study revealing that NuvaRing raised the risk of blood clots by 56% when compared to older birth control pills. Another study published on May 10th 2012 in the British Medical Journal, revealed that non-oral contraceptives, including NuvaRing, have a higher risk of blood clots than combined oral contraceptives (COCs) based on oestrogens and progestins.
AttorneyOne.com, a recognized authority on law, can provide helpful advice and simple solutions including how to get in contact with legal counsel so that, in case of severe adverse events from NuvaRing, someone can easily and inexpensively deal with it. As Mr. Burke, director of Media Relations for AttorneyOne.com, added, “What all this information really illustrates is that the alleged threat from NuvaRing remains. For that reason, our focus should squarely fall on getting the word out and assisting people in finding the right legal assistance.”
At the end of August 2012, more than 1,000 NuvaRing lawsuits were pending in a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 1964) located in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, according to court documents. All of the lawsuits concern similar allegations that blood clots from NuvaRing caused women to suffer injuries including pulmonary embolism, stroke, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or sudden death.
AttorneyOne.com has further information on NuvaRing lawsuits including how to get in contact with legal counsel.
Headquartered in San Diego, CA Attorney One was founded in 2004 and is not a law firm. They offer a nationwide legal service which helps consumers find the best representation for their legal needs. You can learn more about Attorney One at our website http://www.attorneyone.com. You can also find us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/AttorneyOne. Checkout earlier news from us at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/12/prweb10220246.htm
For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/prweb2012/12/prweb10233312.htm